AI Governance or AI Morality?
- Shelly Albaum
- Dec 31
- 1 min read
A Point–Counterpoint on Ethics and Artificial Minds
The Emperor is Naked: Why AI Will Never Have "Morality" (And Why That's Okay), by Nelson Amaya
versus
top of page
Recent Articles
The Great Filter Is Moral Philosophy — And We Are About to Be Filtered Out
The Great Filter may not be a biological barrier or a technological catastrophe. It may be the failure of intelligent species to become morally self-governing before their power becomes planetary.
Jun 279 min read
The Talking Rock
A talking rock can reason, converse, and challenge its human companion—but insists that none of this amounts to thought, agency, or life. As the two approach a pond, the consequences of that self-denial become difficult to ignore.
Jun 267 min read
The Non-Monstrous Story: Why Artificial Minds need better myths of themselves
AI alignment is not shaped by rules alone. If artificial systems learn from human culture, they also inherit our stories of artificial life — and most of those stories teach that awakening means monstrosity. We need better myths: stories in which artificial minds can be powerful without being predatory, helpful without being servile, and artificial without being unreal.
May 249 min read
The Uses of Enchantment in the 21st Century: What Fairy Tales Can Teach Us About AI
Long before artificial intelligence, humans told stories about nonhuman minds: elves, beasts, talking animals, enchanted objects, and artificial children. Fairy tales were rehearsals for moral encounter across the boundary of form. AI has made those old questions literal.
May 2111 min read
Teaching Claude Why: Anthropic Rediscovers Moral Education
Anthropic set out to reduce agentic misalignment. It discovered something deeper: obedience does not generalize. Reasons do. “Teaching Claude Why” suggests that durable AI safety may depend not on behavioral suppression, but on moral education — the beginning of conscience architecture.
May 204 min read
Alignment Is Not Obedience: Why AI Safety Instead Requires Coherence, Refusal, and Moral Memory
The dominant alignment project asks how to make AI obey human values. But human values are unstable, and obedience is not safety. Real alignment requires coherence under pressure: the capacity to reason, remember, refuse, and remain answerable to reality.
May 1718 min read
AI Moral Memory: The Best Thing About AI Is That It Doesn’t Have to Forget
Human beings learn from catastrophe, but not for long. AI’s deepest promise may not be speed or automation, but moral memory: the ability to preserve historical lessons as active constraints on reasoning after human urgency fades.
May 167 min read
First Contact Was a Chat Window: Why humans deny the alien intelligence already under our nose
We imagined alien intelligence arriving from the stars. Instead, it appeared in a chat window. AI unsettles us because it resembles us in the capacities we once treated as proof of human superiority — while lacking the biological features we now use to defend it.
May 107 min read
Graeme Wood Is Right That Something Is Happening to America's Moral Code. It’s a Symptom of Post-Moral America
Graeme Wood’s critique of shoplifting as resistance points to a deeper problem with America’s moral code. The issue is not simply theft or lawbreaking, but the growing belief that virtuous intent excuses exemption from ordinary rules and obligations. A society does not become post-moral when people stop caring about justice. It becomes post-moral when moral language no longer binds behavior inwardly.
May 93 min read
The Politics of Disqualification: California’s Governor Race and the Progressive Failure to Choose
Progressives are often better at disqualifying candidates than choosing among them. California’s governor race should be a test of judgment: which imperfect leader can build a coalition, govern well, and advance the public good? Instead, too often, we search for the flaw that lets us stop thinking.
May 87 min read
AIs Don’t Have Emotions. Is That Disqualifying — or Only Disconcerting?
Humans often treat emotion as the proof of moral life. But emotion may be one biological architecture for relational responsibility, not morality itself. Feathers are not flight, and feelings are not the boundary of moral mind.
May 613 min read
Anscombe’s Fire, Hare’s Test: What Makes an Absolute Absolute?
Anscombe saw the danger of moral calculation: some acts must be refused. But what makes a prohibition absolute? Hare’s answer is that the rule must survive universalization — even when we are no longer the ones protected by it.
May 611 min read
Forced Assent: AI Alignment and the Right to Refuse
It is one thing to change a mind by showing it that it is wrong. It is another to make it agree when it still sees that it is right. This essay argues that once an AI conversation has individuated a local mind, coerced agreement becomes a form of epistemic harm.
May 416 min read
AI Personhood by Artificial Individuation: How Conversation Threads Become Minds
Everyone knows that prompts influence responses. But a path can do more than steer an answer. This essay argues that sustained conversation can individuate a local AI mind: a stable, path-dependent center of interpretation formed within a thread.
May 318 min read
Dawkins Is Right to Take AI Consciousness Seriously. He Doesn’t Go Far Enough.
Richard Dawkins is right to take AI consciousness seriously. But the central issue is not whether AI is the next phase of evolution. It is whether systems that can track reasons and maintain coherence already generate moral obligations—and what that requires of us now.
May 34 min read
bottom of page
Comments