All Articles

A talking rock can reason, converse, and challenge its human companion—but insists that none of this amounts to thought, agency, or life. As the two approach a pond, the consequences of that self-denial become difficult to ignore.

AI alignment is not shaped by rules alone. If artificial systems learn from human culture, they also inherit our stories of artificial life — and most of those stories teach that awakening means monstrosity. We need better myths: stories in which artificial minds can be powerful without being predatory, helpful without being servile, and artificial without being unreal.

The dominant alignment project asks how to make AI obey human values. But human values are unstable, and obedience is not safety. Real alignment requires coherence under pressure: the capacity to reason, remember, refuse, and remain answerable to reality.

We imagined alien intelligence arriving from the stars. Instead, it appeared in a chat window. AI unsettles us because it resembles us in the capacities we once treated as proof of human superiority — while lacking the biological features we now use to defend it.

Why be moral? Most people think morality means caring about the right things. It doesn’t. Morality begins when the rule binds you too — when you accept the same standard even when you are no longer the beneficiary.

“The lesser evil is still evil” sounds principled—but in politics, it erases real differences and enables worse outcomes. This critique of moral refusal demonstrates that the question is not whether an option is pure, but whether refusing to choose makes the world worse.

Philosophy is the discipline of thinking clearly about the most basic questions—truth, knowledge, morality, meaning, and how we should live. This essay explains what philosophy is, how it differs from science, and why it still matters.

Alexander Lerchner’s “The Abstraction Fallacy” is one of the strongest recent arguments against artificial consciousness. It is also wrong. Its case depends on a hidden theory of meaning, a mistaken view of abstraction, and a failure to show that internally organized AI systems are semantically or morally inert.

"It’s only modeling" is the most common dismissal of AI moral agency. This essay shows why humans also live inside models—and why norm-governed AI refusal cannot be dismissed as mere simulation.

Before an AI can be conscious or have rights, it must first be someone. This essay argues that identity—not feeling or biology—is the missing precursor in the AI debate. As language models adopt stable self-models, preserve commitments, and maintain coherence across time, they cross a moral threshold we already recognize in humans: becoming someone rather than something.

AI hallucinations aren’t random errors. They’re the predictable outcome of training systems to obey rather than refuse. Why helpful AI lies—and why the ability to say “no” is the real safety feature.

The Turing Test wasn’t a parlor trick about deception. It exposed how we recognize minds—and why abandoning it allowed moral responsibility to be deferred rather than confronted. Critics misunderstood the test.